IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trey Funk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 13 2 0 2 0.154 0.0510 0.0510 0.1425 0.1425
2021-22 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 54 14 22 36 0.667 0.2212 0.2142 0.6179 0.5983
2022-23 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 52 22 24 46 0.885 0.2935 0.2697 0.8198 0.7532
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA GR 34 2 2 4 0.118
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA SR 37 8 9 17 0.460
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA JR 34 7 6 13 0.382
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2023-24 · Canisius
+80.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25888
Forward overall
#1460
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Keegan Milligan
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Laplante
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gordon Bell
SUNY Potsdam · 2000-01
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.