← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sawyer Senio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-09-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 37 3 8 11 0.297 0.0762 0.0762 0.2203 0.2203
2020-21 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0838 0.0838 0.2317 0.2317
2021-22 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 33 2 6 8 0.242 0.0813 0.0764 0.2247 0.2113
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alvernia D3 MAC SR 25 4 7 11 0.440
2024-25 Alvernia D3 MAC JR 26 6 11 17 0.654
2023-24 Alvernia D3 MAC SO 12 1 1 2 0.167
2022-23 Alvernia D3 MAC FR 26 7 8 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2022-23 · Alvernia
+782.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49942
Forward overall
#2976
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2014-15
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.