← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidyn Hutchinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 42 4 9 13 0.309 0.1038 0.1079 0.2864 0.2976
2022-23 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 39 10 22 32 0.821 0.2102 0.2110 0.6185 0.6209
2023-24 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 47 33 45 78 1.660 0.4252 0.4066 1.2510 1.1963
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SO 29 0 2 2 0.069
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 30 4 6 10 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
+18.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13405
Forward overall
#637
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.