IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidyn Hutchinson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 42 4 9 13 0.309 0.1027 0.1067 0.2868 0.2981
2022-23 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 39 10 22 32 0.821 0.2499 0.2509 0.6081 0.6104
2023-24 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 47 33 45 78 1.660 0.5055 0.4834 1.2299 1.1761
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SO 29 0 2 2 0.069
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA — 30 4 6 10 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
-0.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12921
Forward overall
#611
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Hatton
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.