← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brannon Butler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-02-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 51 4 17 21 0.412 0.1009 0.1009 0.2835 0.2835
2020-21 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 13 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 23 2 7 9 0.391 0.0959 0.0870 0.2694 0.2445
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 25 1 6 7 0.280
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 17 2 2 4 0.235
2023-24 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 23 1 6 7 0.304
2022-23 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 25 0 5 5 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2022-23 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+143.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20569
Defenseman overall
#3073
Defenseman born in 2001
#3929
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2024-25
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2024-25
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.