IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Hipkin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Fort McMurray Oil Barons AJHL 51 12 18 30 0.588 0.1973 0.2028 0.5443 0.5595
2022-23 Calgary Canucks AJHL 56 21 19 40 0.714 0.2396 0.2344 0.6610 0.6468
2023-24 Calgary Canucks AJHL 50 25 27 52 1.040 0.3488 0.3249 0.9624 0.8963
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lindenwood D1 CCHA SO 17 1 2 3 0.176
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 CCHA — 28 4 3 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Lindenwood
1.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18490
Forward overall
#941
Forward born in 2003
#394
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Schroeder
Norwich · 2008-09
0.737 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Nuzzolilo
Framingham State · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.