← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Cossette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.2562 0.2788 0.7538 0.8203
2022-23 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 28 9 9 18 0.643 0.1647 0.1710 0.4846 0.5031
2023-24 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 56 14 18 32 0.571 0.1464 0.1450 0.4307 0.4267
2024-25 La Ronge Ice Wolves SJHL 54 13 28 41 0.759 0.1945 0.1823 0.5724 0.5364
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 28 10 8 18 0.643
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 28 10 8 18 0.643
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 28 10 8 18 0.643
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 28 10 8 18 0.643
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 28 10 8 18 0.643
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 AHA 28 10 8 18 0.643

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28689
Forward overall
#1688
Forward born in 2004
#517
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2006-07
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.