← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jalen Bianchet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-18 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 50 14 18 32 0.640 0.2147 0.2267 0.5923 0.6255
2024-25 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 52 25 30 55 1.058 0.3548 0.3558 0.9788 0.9817
2025-26 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 53 46 41 87 1.641 0.5506 0.5216 1.5190 1.4390
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8940
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 2005
#88
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2018-19
0.13
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
BCHL 2014-15
0.40
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
BCHL 2025-26
0.26
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
USHL 2012-13
0.50
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Middlebury · 2001-02
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.