IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Samuel Boisvert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-26 Country: Canada
Alaska Anchorage
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 53 4 13 17 0.321 0.1236 0.1299 0.4669 0.4906
2024-25 Baie-Comeau Drakkar QMJHL 38 11 20 31 0.816 0.4008 0.3921 2.1784 2.1309
2025-26 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 46 19 30 49 1.065 0.4104 0.3955 0.8900 0.8285
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12340
Forward overall
#585
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Anchorage Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Marcus Mitchell
BCHL 2018-19
0.13
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Sam Mellor
BCHL 2012-13
0.27
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Jeremiah Luedtke
BCHL 2014-15
0.40
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage
Brandon Switzer
SJHL 2015-16
0.14
actual FR PPG at Alaska Anchorage

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Barrow
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Mooney
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2010-11
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy York
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.