← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Neumeier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-02-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 38 1 9 10 0.263 0.0802 0.0802 0.1951 0.1951
2020-21 Kindersley Klippers SJHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.2031 0.2031 0.4941 0.4941
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 58 5 23 28 0.483 0.1913 0.1978 0.5069 0.5242
2022-23 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 60 9 30 39 0.650 0.2575 0.2536 0.6824 0.6722
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 62 5 23 28 0.452 0.2776 0.2476 1.3305 1.1865
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 37 7 16 23 0.622
2024-25 Colgate D1 ECAC 35 8 12 20 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2024-25 · Colgate
+142.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4314
Defenseman overall
#1092
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2012-13
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.