← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicky Romeo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-02 Country: USA
New Hampshire
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 7 2 2 4 0.571 0.2330 0.2557 0.4593 0.5041
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 45 10 11 21 0.467 0.2753 0.2755 1.4017 1.4025
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 57 9 10 19 0.333 0.1966 0.1867 1.0010 0.9505
2025-26 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 62 28 28 56 0.903 0.5328 0.4802 2.7127 2.4448
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10143
Forward overall
#439
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

New Hampshire Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

QMJHL 2024-25
0.40
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
OHL 2016-17
0.47
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
NCDC 2017-18
0.09
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire
QMJHL 2024-25
0.38
actual FR PPG at New Hampshire

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.