IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Curtis Markewich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 61 18 17 35 0.574 0.1470 0.1470 0.4325 0.4325
2001-02 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 61 15 21 36 0.590 0.1512 0.1512 0.4449 0.4449
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 27 4 8 12 0.444
2004-05 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 27 6 9 15 0.556
2003-04 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 27 9 10 19 0.704
2002-03 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 26 6 9 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2002-03 · St. Scholastica
+350.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31972
Forward overall
#654
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Sawicky
Bethel · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Quigley
Trinity · 2006-07
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.