← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Ramos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 55 21 15 36 0.654 0.2325 0.2545 0.6872 0.7524
2023-24 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 47 6 12 18 0.383 0.2259 0.2262 1.1284 1.1301
2024-25 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 60 15 24 39 0.650 0.3834 0.3644 1.9150 1.8202
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA FR 35 7 9 16 0.457
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2025-26 · Lake Superior State
+72.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

85%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14253
Forward overall
#724
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.35 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.