IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rasmus Larsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-09 Country: Sweden
2023 NHL Draft Round 5, Pick #152  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — SuperElit 18 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — SuperElit 50 16 18 34 0.680 0.2664 0.2646 0.8352 0.8296
2023-24 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 59 4 13 17 0.288 0.1771 0.1663 0.8488 0.7972
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA — 29 3 0 3 0.103
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
-46.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4040
Defenseman overall
#1053
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2006-07
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Louie Marcellino
Bowdoin · 2024-25
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.