IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elliott Groenewold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-02-04 Country: USA
2024 NHL Draft Round 4, Pick #110  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 57 5 11 16 0.281 0.1725 0.1792 0.8270 0.8589
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 40 7 13 20 0.500
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 38 4 8 12 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Quinnipiac
+86.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8605
Defenseman overall
#1767
Defenseman born in 2006
#3066
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mark Auk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Jack Stander
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Canisius (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Clint Lewis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Roy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Josh Couturier
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Boston College (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Howie
Marian · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kim Hilmersson
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Silcoff
Middlebury · 2010-11
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.