IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Ramsay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 1 5 6 0.231 0.0443 0.0443 0.1052 0.1052
2019-20 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 1 13 14 0.518 0.0996 0.0996 0.2362 0.2362
2020-21 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.0960 0.0960 0.2278 0.2278
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 54 2 2 4 0.074 0.0437 0.0440 0.2218 0.2235
2022-23 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 59 4 5 9 0.152 0.0900 0.0860 0.4566 0.4363
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 16 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18686
Defenseman overall
#3251
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Wilson
Lebanon Valley · 2006-07
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bronson Zoltán Kovács
Hobart · 2009-10
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Thorogood
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.