IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Green Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-06-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2001-02 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2002-03 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 46 27 27 54 1.174 0.3008 0.3124 0.8849 0.9191
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 King's D1 MAC JR 24 2 1 3 0.125
2019-20 King's D3 MAC JR 24 2 1 3 0.125
2018-19 King's D1 MAC SO 22 1 0 1 0.045
2018-19 King's D3 MAC SO 22 1 0 1 0.045
2017-18 King's D3 MAC FR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2006-07 RPI D1 ECAC SR 15 1 2 3 0.200
2005-06 RPI D1 ECAC JR 15 2 1 3 0.200
2004-05 RPI D1 ECAC SO 14 1 0 1 0.071
2003-04 RPI D1 ECAC FR 22 6 2 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2003-04 · RPI
+36.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11636
Forward overall
#356
Forward born in 1984
#51
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Norris
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2020-21
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2010-11
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.