IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kent Lillejord Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-12-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 52 13 10 23 0.442 0.1278 0.1365 0.3330 0.3557
2005-06 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 53 8 8 16 0.302 0.0872 0.0890 0.2273 0.2321
2006-07 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 58 10 22 32 0.552 0.1594 0.1543 0.4153 0.4021
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Northland D3 — FR 12 4 5 9 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2007-08 · Northland
+583.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31587
Forward overall
#1164
Forward born in 1986
#1226
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick O'Neal
Norwich · 2018-19
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Blanchet
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Otto
St. Olaf · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.