IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Philbrick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 27 4 13 17 0.630 0.1247 0.1247 0.2868 0.2868
2022-23 Cushing Academy NE-Prep 32 2 21 23 0.719 0.1424 0.1424 0.3275 0.3275
2023-24 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 30 2 5 7 0.233 0.1376 0.1317 0.7007 0.6708
2024-25 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 28 4 7 11 0.393 0.1514 0.1413 0.5718 0.5335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 35 4 4 8 0.229
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2025-26 · New Hampshire
+76.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9932
Defenseman overall
#2167
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Isak Tranvik
St. Olaf · 2006-07
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake McKenelly
Wentworth · 2017-18
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Bonito
Endicott · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.