| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Capital District Selects | EJHL | 37 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.378 | 0.1121 | 0.1207 | — | — |
| 2005-06 | — | EJHL | 42 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 0.905 | 0.2681 | 0.2759 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Fitchburg State | D3 | MASCAC | SR | 16 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.625 |
| 2010-11 | Fitchburg State | D3 | MASCAC | JR | 25 | 12 | 22 | 34 | 1.360 |
| 2009-10 | Fitchburg State | D3 | — | SO | 26 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0.692 |
| 2008-09 | Fitchburg State | D3 | — | FR | 27 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.704 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.