IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Contini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-02-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 North York Rangers OJHL 47 20 19 39 0.830 0.2034 0.2124 0.5680 0.5930
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Williams D3 NESCAC — 27 9 24 33 1.222
2009-10 Williams D3 — — 24 9 7 16 0.667
2008-09 RPI D1 — — 12 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 RPI D1 — — 32 1 3 4 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2007-08 · RPI
-31.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21183
Forward overall
#707
Forward born in 1989
#894
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Andrew Oglevie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Talcott
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garrett Gamez
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Providence (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2022-23
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Fea
Wilkes · 2014-15
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Pat Power
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.