← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Ronn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-09 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Champlin Park USHS-MN 19 9 7 16 0.842 0.2267 0.2267 0.2045 0.2045
2021-22 Champlin Park USHS-MN 27 18 28 46 1.704 0.4586 0.4586 0.4138 0.4138
2022-23 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 8 3 7 10 1.250 0.4952 0.5443 1.3124 1.4424
2023-24 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 7 1 4 5 0.714 0.4391 0.4416 2.1045 2.1166
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 57 15 8 23 0.404 0.2480 0.2368 1.1888 1.1350
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen 37 4 5 9 0.243
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CCHA FR 36 4 5 9 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2025-26 · Minnesota
-10.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8055
Forward overall
#318
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stevenson · 2017-18
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.