← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-10-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Bay State Breakers EJHL 28 2 4 6 0.214 0.0635 0.0723
2005-06 Bay State Breakers EJHL 21 0 5 5 0.238 0.0705 0.0769
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 25 8 19 27 1.080
2011-12 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 26 7 21 28 1.077
2010-11 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 26 9 17 26 1.000
2009-10 Saint Anselm D2 FR 27 12 14 26 0.963
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2009-10 · Saint Anselm
+1397.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#53638
Forward overall
#1780
Forward born in 1988
#377
in EJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ American International (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Niagara
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.