IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Christensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 — NTDP-U18 29 3 2 5 0.172 0.1337 0.1329 0.6417 0.6377
2013-14 — USHL 45 6 8 14 0.311 0.1912 0.1949 0.9166 0.9342
2014-15 — USHL 55 8 15 23 0.418 0.2571 0.2494 1.2321 1.1953
2015-16 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 52 16 20 36 0.692 0.2579 0.2434 1.0088 0.9520
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 American International D1 AHA SR 34 11 17 28 0.824
2018-19 American International D1 AHA JR 41 16 31 47 1.146
2017-18 American International D1 AHA SO 34 13 10 23 0.676
2016-17 American International D1 AHA FR 33 8 13 21 0.636
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2016-17 · American International
+202.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22119
Forward overall
#839
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Hall
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.