| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Valley Jr. Warriors | EJHL | 38 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 0.579 | 0.1715 | 0.1710 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | UMass Dartmouth | D3 | ECAC | SR | 26 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.962 |
| 2009-10 | UMass Dartmouth | D3 | ECAC | JR | 25 | 9 | 21 | 30 | 1.200 |
| 2008-09 | UMass Dartmouth | D3 | ECAC | SO | 14 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.929 |
| 2007-08 | UMass Dartmouth | D3 | ECAC | FR | 28 | 15 | 21 | 36 | 1.286 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.