IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 54 6 7 13 0.241 0.1789 0.1811 0.8981 0.9093
2024-25 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 62 5 12 17 0.274 0.2038 0.1968 1.0231 0.9878
2025-26 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 65 20 23 43 0.661 0.3218 0.3176 1.6231 1.6021
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20819
Forward overall
#627
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrew Poturalski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Willem Nong-Lambert
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dom Murphy
University of New England · 2021-22
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cannon Bonifay
Westfield State · 2023-24
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Tatro
Salem State · 2021-22
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.