← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wilson Dahlheimer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Monticello USHS-MN 31 18 22 40 1.290 0.1590 0.1590 0.3134 0.3134
2020-21 Monticello USHS-MN 20 9 16 25 1.250 0.1540 0.1540 0.3036 0.3036
2021-22 Monticello USHS-MN 29 24 25 49 1.690 0.2082 0.2082 0.4104 0.4104
2022-23 Anchorage Wolverines NAHL 48 9 20 29 0.604 0.2146 0.2180 0.6343 0.6442
2023-24 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 30 2 1 3 0.100 0.0590 0.0544 0.2946 0.2717
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SO 33 5 2 7 0.212
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA 20 0 3 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2024-25 · Lake Superior State
+46.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35158
Forward overall
#2148
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2012-13
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.