IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Jacobucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-01-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 45 3 16 19 0.422 0.0813 0.0826 0.2662 0.2705
2007-08 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 62 4 17 21 0.339 0.0652 0.0627 0.2136 0.2055
2008-09 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 56 4 23 27 0.482 0.0928 0.0847 0.3040 0.2774
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#14923
Defenseman overall
#1450
Defenseman born in 1988
#1106
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Johnson
Framingham State · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Knowlton
Trinity · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Carlyle
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.