← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eddie Revenig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-12-21 Country: USA
Bemidji State
CCHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Edina USHS-MN 30 3 9 12 0.400 0.0506 0.0506 0.0972 0.0972
2022-23 Edina USHS-MN 30 1 20 21 0.700 0.0886 0.0886 0.1700 0.1700
2023-24 Fargo Force USHL 49 0 3 3 0.061 0.0361 0.0373 0.1838 0.1898
2024-25 Fargo Force USHL 22 0 3 3 0.136 0.0805 0.0790 0.4097 0.4021
2025-26 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 52 9 32 41 0.788 0.2897 0.2828 0.8323 0.8126
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7558
Defenseman overall
#1778
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

Bemidji State Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

SHL 2025-26
0.69
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
MJHL 2017-18
0.11
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
NAHL 2013-14
0.24
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.75
actual FR PPG at Bemidji State

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2024-25
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2009-10
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2013-14
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.