IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brant Harris Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-08 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Mora IK · Allsvenskan

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Estevan Bruins SJHL 40 3 9 12 0.300 0.0769 0.0811 0.2223 0.2345
2008-09 Estevan Bruins SJHL 56 17 24 41 0.732 0.1876 0.1885 0.5426 0.5453
2009-10 — SJHL 51 17 34 51 1.000 0.2562 0.2457 0.7411 0.7108
2019-20 Mora IK Allsvenskan 27 9 11 20 0.741 1.8518 1.8518 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 UConn D1 — SR 30 11 15 26 0.867
2012-13 UConn D1 — JR 37 15 16 31 0.838
2011-12 UConn D1 — SO 39 18 15 33 0.846
2010-11 UConn D1 — FR 35 8 14 22 0.629
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2010-11 · UConn
+229.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1550
Forward overall
#59
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Teddy Purcell
SUNY Geneseo · 2005-06
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Frost
Castleton · 2010-11
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Cherneski
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.