← New Search ↗ Social Card

Poul Andersen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-06-01 Country: USA
Maine
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 15 4 4 8 0.533 0.0675 0.0675 0.1295 0.1295
2023-24 Lincoln Stars USHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.2949 0.3257 1.5017 1.6588
2024-25 Sherwood Park Crusaders BCHL 51 29 30 59 1.157 0.4458 0.4816 1.6836 1.8189
2025-26 Edmonton Oil Kings WHL 64 25 21 46 0.719 0.3497 0.3507 1.7637 1.7685
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13672
Forward overall
#364
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG

Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Maine
BCHL 2012-13
0.08
actual FR PPG at Maine
USHL 2012-13
0.35
actual FR PPG at Maine
NAHL 2020-21
0.21
actual FR PPG at Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2007-08
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.