IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Clewlow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-11-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Toronto Dixie Beehives OJHL 48 28 30 58 1.208 0.3376 0.3325 0.8338 0.8211
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Elmira D3 — SR 24 10 5 15 0.625
2010-11 Elmira D3 — JR 24 6 9 15 0.625
2009-10 Elmira D3 — SO 28 12 8 20 0.714
2008-09 Elmira D3 — FR 10 2 4 6 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2008-09 · Elmira
+110.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8119
Forward overall
#374
Forward born in 1988
#262
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Peter Krieger
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Average
NCAAe PPG
Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jim Pearson
Concordia Wisconsin · 2014-15
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Douglas Elgstam
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2005-06
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.