← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 0 7 7 0.259 0.0514 0.0514 0.1181 0.1181
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 49 12 13 25 0.510 0.1874 0.1946 0.5385 0.5591
2023-24 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 45 16 24 40 0.889 0.3266 0.3235
2024-25 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 42 17 14 31 0.738 0.2844 0.2619 1.0742 0.9891
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast FR 33 4 6 10 0.303
2025-26 RIT D1 AHA FR 36 11 6 17 0.472
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2025-26 · Boston College
+23.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17470
Forward overall
#865
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2024-25
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.