IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Pelletier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-01 Country: USA
Boston College
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 24 2 4 6 0.250 0.0495 0.0495 0.1139 0.1139
2022-23 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 28 9 12 21 0.750 0.1486 0.1486 0.3417 0.3417
2023-24 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 27 17 23 40 1.482 0.2935 0.2935 — —
2024-25 Lincoln Stars USHL 60 16 21 37 0.617 0.3638 0.3469 1.8522 1.7663
2025-26 Lincoln Stars USHL 59 48 37 85 1.441 0.8499 0.7694 4.3270 3.9174
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

88%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3794
Forward overall
#73
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Boston College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jake Sondreal
USHL 2023-24
0.17
actual FR PPG at Boston College
Jeremy Bracco
OHL 2016-17
0.60
actual FR PPG at Boston College

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.