IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Troiani Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-06-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 44 6 14 20 0.455 0.1114 0.1182 0.3129 0.3319
2007-08 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 43 6 42 48 1.116 0.2736 0.2779 0.7686 0.7806
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 26 9 15 24 0.923
2010-11 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 20 3 8 11 0.550
2009-10 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 21 3 8 11 0.524
2008-09 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 26 5 10 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2008-09 · Williams
+185.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4458
Defenseman overall
#709
Defenseman born in 1989
#856
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ian Brady
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.64 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Gavin Bayreuther
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.95 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Daniels
Westfield State · 2012-13
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Shand
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Raphael Robitaille
Norwich · 2003-04
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.