IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Griffiths Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 — MJHL 52 6 14 20 0.385 0.0740 0.0741 0.2424 0.2426
2009-10 — MJHL 44 18 18 36 0.818 0.1575 0.1506 0.5156 0.4930
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2012-13 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — JR 18 3 4 7 0.389
2011-12 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 14 3 1 4 0.286
2010-11 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 10 2 0 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2010-11 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+94.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29336
Forward overall
#963
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Arthur Gordon
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Horan
Williams · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.