IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Martin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-05-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Toronto Patriots OJHL 44 13 13 26 0.591 0.1448 0.1463 0.4068 0.4110
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 47 14 14 28 0.596 0.1460 0.1398 0.4101 0.3928
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 9 0 1 1 0.111
2012-13 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 21 0 2 2 0.095
2010-11 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 23 2 7 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2010-11 · Johnson & Wales
+221.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31913
Forward overall
#1162
Forward born in 1990
#1742
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Cayemberg
Wisconsin-Stout · 2011-12
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Will McLaughlin
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.