← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will McLaughlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-02 Country: USA
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 OJHL 39 12 10 22 0.564 0.1576 0.1516 0.3893 0.3745
2008-09 Trenton Hercs OJHL 30 6 10 16 0.533 0.1490 0.1357 0.3680 0.3351
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2011-12 Fredonia D3 JR 23 4 5 9 0.391
2010-11 Fredonia D3 SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2009-10 Fredonia D3 FR 13 1 8 9 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2009-10 · Fredonia
+469.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27232
Forward overall
#1100
Forward born in 1988
#2349
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2021-22
0.17
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
NAHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2000-01
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.