← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will McLaughlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-02 Country: USA
Colorado College
NCHC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 OJHL 39 12 10 22 0.564 0.1383 0.1330 0.3884 0.3736
2008-09 Trenton Hercs OJHL 30 6 10 16 0.533 0.1307 0.1190 0.3672 0.3344
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 23 3 4 7 0.304
2011-12 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 23 4 5 9 0.391
2010-11 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2009-10 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 13 1 8 9 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2009-10 · Fredonia
+548.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34452
Forward overall
#1153
Forward born in 1988
#1977
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

Colorado College Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

BCHL 2018-19
0.25
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.27
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Colorado College
USHL 2020-21
0.14
actual FR PPG at Colorado College

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2000-01
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2024-25
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.