← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Pochipinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 57 6 5 11 0.193 0.0744 0.0765 0.2809 0.2890
2017-18 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 58 21 17 38 0.655 0.2524 0.2475 0.9535 0.9350
2018-19 Penticton Vees BCHL 18 3 3 6 0.333 0.1284 0.1190 0.4851 0.4495
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Air Force D1 AHA GR 14 1 3 4 0.286
2021-22 Air Force D1 AHA SR 7 2 0 2 0.286
2020-21 Air Force D1 AHA SO 14 2 1 3 0.214
2019-20 Air Force D1 AHA SO 36 1 6 7 0.194
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC 4 1 0 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2018-19 · Colorado College
+63.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36723
Forward overall
#1877
Forward born in 1998
#2069
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2007-08
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.