← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tommy Middleton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 53 9 15 24 0.453 0.1681 0.1761 0.4794 0.5021
2019-20 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 47 7 4 11 0.234 0.1490 0.1490 0.7012 0.7012
2020-21 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 17 1 2 3 0.176 0.1124 0.1124 0.5289 0.5289
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Colorado College D1 NCHC SR 21 1 4 5 0.238
2023-24 Colorado College D1 NCHC JR 36 4 4 8 0.222
2022-23 Colorado College D1 NCHC SO 33 1 2 3 0.091
2021-22 Colorado College D1 NCHC FR 35 2 3 5 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2021-22 · Colorado College
-5.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19348
Forward overall
#603
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Air Force (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2018-19
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.