IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Schankula Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 11 2 3 5 0.455 0.1670 0.1753 0.4797 0.5036
2022-23 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 54 12 22 34 0.630 0.2313 0.2314 0.6645 0.6649
2023-24 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 29 11 20 31 1.069 0.3928 0.3743 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 14 1 2 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2023-24 · Bowling Green
+19.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14529
Forward overall
#705
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2007-08
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trent Cassan
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.821 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mathieu MacMillan
Utica · 2023-24
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.