IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trent Cassan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-06-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 58 18 15 33 0.569 0.1644 0.1714 0.4283 0.4466
2002-03 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 57 21 25 46 0.807 0.2331 0.2305 0.6075 0.6007
2003-04 Yorkton Terriers SJHL 56 32 30 62 1.107 0.3198 0.3009 0.8334 0.7842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 22 6 14 20 0.909
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 25 16 8 24 0.960
2005-06 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 17 10 6 16 0.941
2004-05 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 28 10 13 23 0.821
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2004-05 · SUNY Geneseo
+251.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13927
Forward overall
#521
Forward born in 1983
#257
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jarrett Cammarata
Bethel · 2018-19
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Noel Lortie
Elmira · 2005-06
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dalton Jay
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.