← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Barnes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-07-31 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Omaha Lancers USHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Omaha Lancers USHL 59 0 2 2 0.034 0.0200 0.0202 0.1018 0.1030
2025-26 Niagara IceDogs OHL 46 1 9 10 0.217 0.1258 0.1208 0.5586 0.5366
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19947
Defenseman overall
#3302
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Boston University
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University
SHL 2025-26
0.05
actual FR PPG at Boston University
NE-Prep 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2007-08
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.