IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Rush Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-12-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Seguin Bruins OJHL 12 2 1 3 0.250 0.0613 0.0574 0.1721 0.1612
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 12 2 1 3 0.250
2010-11 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 14 2 4 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2010-11 · Hobart
+772.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#52347
Forward overall
#1769
Forward born in 1989
#4039
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maksis Brimanis
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Gaughan
Saint John's · 2010-11
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Gorrie
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.