← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jonathan Cristini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 King Rebellion OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2004-05 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 45 2 9 11 0.244 0.0599 0.0618 0.1683 0.1736
2005-06 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0387 0.0385 0.1087 0.1081
2006-07 Orangeville Crushers OJHL 49 13 16 29 0.592 0.1451 0.1371 0.4075 0.3850
2007-08 OJHL 50 22 22 44 0.880 0.2157 0.1940 0.6059 0.5450
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 22 2 7 9 0.409
2010-11 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 20 2 4 6 0.300
2009-10 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 13 2 5 7 0.538
2008-09 Neumann D3 MAC 16 1 1 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2008-09 · Neumann
-14.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30406
Forward overall
#974
Forward born in 1987
#1603
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2023-24
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.