| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Notre Dame Hounds | SJHL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.2562 | 0.2859 | 0.7538 | 0.8410 |
| 2012-13 | Notre Dame Hounds | SJHL | 48 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.417 | 0.1068 | 0.1144 | 0.3141 | 0.3365 |
| 2013-14 | Notre Dame Hounds | SJHL | 48 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.312 | 0.0801 | 0.0816 | 0.2356 | 0.2400 |
| 2014-15 | Notre Dame Hounds | SJHL | 52 | 15 | 17 | 32 | 0.615 | 0.1577 | 0.1523 | 0.4639 | 0.4481 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Manhattanville | D1 | UCHC | SR | 23 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.391 |
| 2018-19 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SR | 23 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.391 |
| 2017-18 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | JR | 18 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0.500 |
| 2016-17 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | SO | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.100 |
| 2015-16 | Manhattanville | D3 | UCHC | FR | 21 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.381 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.