IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Barber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-05-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Nepean Raiders CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Nepean Raiders CCHL 51 0 6 6 0.118 0.0255 0.0259 0.0910 0.0924
2007-08 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 8 5 13 0.217 0.0470 0.0455 0.1677 0.1622
2008-09 Nepean Raiders CCHL 26 3 9 12 0.462 0.1001 0.0910 0.3572 0.3246
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 21 0 9 9 0.429
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 23 0 6 6 0.261
2009-10 Castleton D3 — FR 25 0 7 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2009-10 · Castleton
+307.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17385
Defenseman overall
#1549
Defenseman born in 1988
#1412
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Miller
Wisconsin-Superior · 2001-02
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian Blomquist
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lionel Mauron
Curry · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.