← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Dennis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-07 Country: USA
Michigan
BigTen D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 55 9 25 34 0.618 0.3647 0.3830 1.8550 1.9480
2025-26 Brantford Bulldogs OHL 68 34 40 74 1.088 0.6295 0.6288 2.8493 2.8462
2026-27 Peterborough Petes OHL 7 2 6 8 1.143 0.6612 0.6612 2.9926 2.9926
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5286
Forward overall
#75
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Yale (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Average
NCAAe PPG

Michigan Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2019-20
0.05
actual FR PPG at Michigan
USHL 2012-13
0.07
actual FR PPG at Michigan
BCHL 2019-20
0.14
actual FR PPG at Michigan
AJHL 2021-22
0.92
actual FR PPG at Michigan

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2001-02
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.