← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Roy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 39 2 10 12 0.308 0.0514 0.0521 0.1281 0.1298
2006-07 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 32 7 15 22 0.688 0.1148 0.1109 0.2862 0.2765
2007-08 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 42 17 28 45 1.071 0.1789 0.1625 0.4460 0.4051
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2010-11 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 13 3 1 4 0.308
2009-10 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2008-09 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 22 3 1 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2008-09 · Salem State
+49.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30852
Forward overall
#991
Forward born in 1987
#372
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.