IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Roy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 39 2 10 12 0.308 0.0519 0.0526 0.1278 0.1295
2006-07 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 32 7 15 22 0.688 0.1159 0.1120 0.2857 0.2760
2007-08 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 42 17 28 45 1.071 0.1806 0.1640 0.4452 0.4044
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2010-11 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 13 3 1 4 0.308
2009-10 Salem State D3 — SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2008-09 Salem State D3 — FR 22 3 1 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2008-09 · Salem State
+48.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31291
Forward overall
#1198
Forward born in 1987
#350
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Ross
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Backman
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.