IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian White Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Port Hope Predators OJHL 38 5 15 20 0.526 0.1290 0.1288 0.3623 0.3617
2007-08 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 61 11 16 27 0.443 0.0852 0.0827 0.2797 0.2715
2008-09 Neepawa Titans MJHL 35 4 21 25 0.714 0.1375 0.1267 0.4514 0.4159
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 19 1 7 8 0.421
2011-12 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 23 0 9 9 0.391
2010-11 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 17 2 2 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2010-11 · Gustavus Adolphus
+151.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35108
Forward overall
#1168
Forward born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Jaldung
Salve Regina · 2023-24
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Brown
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Bulawka
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.