IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Crawford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-04-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 45 1 4 5 0.111 0.0272 0.0285 0.0765 0.0802
2007-08 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 49 2 9 11 0.225 0.0550 0.0552 0.1546 0.1551
2008-09 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 36 1 8 9 0.250 0.0613 0.0584 0.1721 0.1639
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 18 1 3 4 0.222
2009-10 Lake Forest D3 NCHA — 18 1 1 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2009-10 · Lake Forest
+106.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23567
Defenseman overall
#1863
Defenseman born in 1989
#4378
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Casey Sturm
New England College · 2024-25
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Nedelka
Fitchburg State · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Fagan
Norwich · 2022-23
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.